Search

Closed Case

*Clean Wisconsin, Inc. v. DNR – Act 21 Explicit Authority and Public Trust Delegation

Regulatory Certainty

*Great Lakes Legal Foundation Case

Great Lakes Legal Foundation represented eight Wisconsin business associations in this Act 21 explicit authority case. The question at issue is whether an agency must consider only the authority given to it explicitly by the legislature, or consider other sources of authority as well.

On Oct. 11, 2017, the Dane County Circuit Court ruled in favor of Clean Wisconsin to void seven high capacity well permits approved by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resource (DNR). The court rested its decision on the Public Trust Doctrine and the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Lake Beulah Decision. On April 9, 2019, the Wisconsin Supreme Court accepted Clean Wisconsin and its companion case, Kinnard Farms. Opening and reply briefs have been filed and oral arguments are scheduled for April 12, 2021.

Why This Case is Important

2011 Wis. Act 21 limits agency authority to the explicit language of a statute—no delegations arising from legislative intent, purpose, findings, or policy. DNR followed the explicit language in high capacity well permitting statutes that limited considerations when it approved nine high capacity well permits. Clean Wisconsin, DOJ and DNR argue agencies must take into account other sources of authority, including authority implied in prefatory statutory provisions.

While Wisconsin Legislature v. Palm recently addressed Act 21’s prescriptions for agency authority, DNR continues to ignore the bounds of its enabling legislation with its high capacity well permitting program. In its decision, the court should establish judicial review standards when assessing the reach of agency authorities. If the court finds that such legislative delegations to agencies must indeed be explicit, then Act 21 may well be the most important constraint ever on the administrative state.

Key Documents

Affidavit of Carl A. Sinderbrand (June 16, 2017)
Noting Wisconsin Supreme Court in Lake Beulah did not address Act 21 provisions at issue in this case.

Court:

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Appeal No.:

Stage:

Closed

Our Involvement:

Intervenor/Co-Appellant
Share