*Great Lakes Legal Foundation Case
Great Lakes Legal Foundation represented eight Wisconsin business associations in this Act 21 explicit authority case. The question at issue is whether an agency must consider only the authority given to it explicitly by the legislature, or consider other sources of authority as well.
On Oct. 11, 2017, the Dane County Circuit Court ruled in favor of Clean Wisconsin to void seven high capacity well permits approved by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resource (DNR). The court rested its decision on the Public Trust Doctrine and the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Lake Beulah Decision. On April 9, 2019, the Wisconsin Supreme Court accepted Clean Wisconsin and its companion case, Kinnard Farms. Opening and reply briefs have been filed and oral arguments are scheduled for April 12, 2021.
Why This Case is Important
2011 Wis. Act 21 limits agency authority to the explicit language of a statute—no delegations arising from legislative intent, purpose, findings, or policy. DNR followed the explicit language in high capacity well permitting statutes that limited considerations when it approved nine high capacity well permits. Clean Wisconsin, DOJ and DNR argue agencies must take into account other sources of authority, including authority implied in prefatory statutory provisions.
While Wisconsin Legislature v. Palm recently addressed Act 21’s prescriptions for agency authority, DNR continues to ignore the bounds of its enabling legislation with its high capacity well permitting program. In its decision, the court should establish judicial review standards when assessing the reach of agency authorities. If the court finds that such legislative delegations to agencies must indeed be explicit, then Act 21 may well be the most important constraint ever on the administrative state.
Key Documents
GLLF Reply Brief (March 24, 2021)
Wisconsin Legislature Reply Brief (March 24, 2021)
DNR Response Brief (March 10, 2021)
Clean Wisconsin Response Brief (March 10, 2021)
GLLF Opening Brief (February 4, 2021)
Legislature Initial Brief (February 4, 2021)
Filings Relating to Legislative Intervention
SC Order on Briefing Schedule (January 5, 2021)
SC Order on Motion to Intervene (January 5, 2021)
SC Order Intervention Briefing (May 30, 2019)
SC Order Briefing Stay (May 7, 2019)
SC Order_Taking Case and Briefing (April 4, 2019)
GLLF Co-Appellants’ Initial Brief (May 2, 2018)
DOJ/DNR Appellate Opening Brief (May 2, 2018)
Clean Wisconsin Response Brief (June 1, 2018)
GLLF Co-Applellants’ Reply Brief (June 18, 2018)
Circuit Court Decision (Oct. 11, 2017)
Clean Wisconsin’s Principal Brief (June 16, 2017)
DOJ/DNR Response Brief (Aug. 4, 2017)
GLLF Response Brief (Aug. 7, 2017)
Clean Wisconsin Reply Brief (Aug. 23, 2017)
Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners on Behalf of the Town of Rome (June 26, 2017)
Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners on Behalf of Central Sands Water Action Coalition (June 19, 2017)
GLLF Notice of Petition and Petition to Intervene (Jan. 6, 2017)
GLLF Brief in Support of Petition to Intervene (Jan. 6, 2017)
GLLF Combined Affidavits (Various dates)
Order Granting Permission to Intervene (June 9, 2017)
Affidavit of Carl A. Sinderbrand (June 16, 2017)
Noting Wisconsin Supreme Court in Lake Beulah did not address Act 21 provisions at issue in this case.