Search

Active Case

Binversie v. Town of Eureka

Free Enterprise, Regulatory Certainty

This lawsuit, filed on behalf of two taxpayers against the Town of Eureka, challenges an onerous permitting scheme imposed by Eureka on livestock farms known as CAFOs. This permitting scheme requires, for example, applicants to pay $1 per animal unit before receiving a permit for a new or expanded livestock facility, even though state law imposes a $1,000 cap on any such permit fees. Eureka’s scheme also requires that an engineer or geoscientist attest to the applicant’s plans for transportation, waste, animal health, odor and air pollution, property values, and more. On top of all that, the scheme further requires that applicants reimburse the Town “for all legal services, expert consulting services, and other expenses which may be reasonably incurred by the Town in reviewing and considering the application.” This lawsuit challenges these requirements and more on the ground they are preempted by Wisconsin’s Livestock Facility Siting Law, Wis. Stat. § 93.90.

Why This Case is Important

Agriculture is one of the leading sectors of Wisconsin’s economy, and dairy farms are a major employer in this industry. In addition to their major contributions to our state’s economy, dairy farms also produce much of the food that we eat. Unfortunately, many farms are leaving Wisconsin because they are stifled by regulation. This lawsuit aims to strike down an ordinance that places Wisconsin farmers at a competitive disadvantage.

Court:

Polk County Circuit Court

Case No.:

Polk County Case No. 2024-CV-209

Stage:

Motion to Dismiss

Our Involvement:

The WMC Litigation Center filed and is litigating this lawsuit on behalf of two taxpayers
Share